4.8 Article

The osteoinductive properties of mesoporous silicate coated with osteostatin in a rabbit femur cavity defect model

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 33, 页码 8564-8573

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.103

关键词

Biocompatibility; Bone regeneration; Bone tissue engineering; Inducing osteogenesis; Osteostatine; SBA15 mesoporous silica

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI050117, PI080922, RETICEFRD06/0013/1002, RD06/0013/1006]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [SAF2005-05254]
  3. Fundacion de Investigacion Medica Mutua Madrilena
  4. Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CICYT, Spain) [MAT2008-736]
  5. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid [S2009/MAT-1472]
  6. Fundacion Conchita Rabago

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) is an important regulator of bone formation and remodeling. Our recent findings demonstrate that PTHrP (107-111) (osteostatin) loaded onto silica-based ordered mesoporous SBA15 materials exhibit osteogenic features in osteoblastic cell cultures. We aimed here to elucidate whether these peptide-coated materials might be suitable for promoting bone repair following a cavitary defect in the rabbit femur. Histological examination revealed the absence of significant inflammation or bone resorption within the time of study (4 and 8 weeks) after implantation. At 8 weeks, the peptide-unloaded materials were still separated from the bone marrow by a fibrous cap, which was greatly diminished by the presence of the PTHrP peptide. By using mu CT analysis, new bone formation was evident at different distances from the implants, mainly for the latter peptide-loaded biomaterials. This was confirmed by performing immunostaining for different osteoblast markers. Our findings demonstrate that these PTHrP (107-111)-loaded bioceramics significantly improve local bone induction, as compared to that observed with the unloaded material. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据