4.8 Article

Liquid-crystalline aromatic-aliphatic copolyester bioresorbable polymers

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 30, 页码 7599-7605

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.006

关键词

Liquid crystal; Polymerisation; Mechanical properties; Biodegradation; Biocompatibility

资金

  1. Yorkshire Forward, UK
  2. European Union
  3. EPSRC [EP/E064299/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E064299/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis and characterisation of a series of liquid-crystalline aromatic-aliphatic copolyesters are presented. Differential scanning calorimetry showed these polymers have a glass transition temperature in the range 72 degrees C-116 degrees C. Polarised optical microscopy showed each polymer exhibits a nematic mesophase on heating to the molten state at temperatures below 165 degrees C. Melt processing is demonstrated by the production of injection moulded and compression moulded specimens with Young's modulus of 5.7 +/- 0.3 GPa and 2.3 +/- 0.3 GPa, respectively. Wide-angle X-ray scattering data showed molecular orientation is responsible for the increase of mechanical properties along the injection direction. Degradation studies in the temperature range 37 degrees C-80 degrees C are presented for one polymer of this series and a kinetic constant of 0.002 days(-1) is obtained at 37 degrees C assuming a first order reaction. The activation energy (83.4 kJ mol(-1)) is obtained following the Arrhenius analysis of degradation, showing degradation of this material is less temperature sensitive compared with other commercially available biodegradable polyesters. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility data are presented and it is shown the unique combination of degradative, mechanical and biological properties of these polymers may represent in the future an alternative for medical device manufacturers. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据