4.8 Article

Self-assembled nanoplatform for targeted delivery of chemotherapy agents via affinity-regulated molecular interactions

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 30, 页码 7766-7775

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.038

关键词

Self-assembled nanoparticle; Targeted nanoplatform; Adhesion molecule; Tumor targeting; Drug delivery; Payload encapsulation

资金

  1. American Heart Association
  2. NIH [R01 GM090320]
  3. Business for International Cooperative R&D between Industry, Academy, and Research Institute (Korea Small and Medium Business Administration [00042115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Site-specific delivery of drugs while minimizing unwanted distribution has been one of the pursued goals in cancer therapy. In this endeavor, we have developed targeted polymeric nanoparticles called amphiphilic urethane acrylate nonionomer (UAN) for encapsulation of diverse water-insoluble drugs and diagnostic agents, as well as for simple and reproducible surface conjugation of targeting ligands. Using monoclonal antibodies or lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) I domain engineered for varying affinities to intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, we were able to deliver UAN nanoparticles to human cancer cells with the efficiency dependent on the strength of the molecular interactions and the degree of ICAM-1 expression on cell surface. Compared to non-specific uptake of free drugs, targeted delivery of UAN nanoparticles carrying equal amount of drugs produced more potent cytotoxicity. Notably, without the targeting ligands attached, UAN nanoparticles were largely precluded from nonspecific uptake by the cells, resulting in much lower toxicity. The versatility of our UAN nanoparticles in both payload encapsulation and presentation of targeting ligands may facilitate developing a robust platform for evaluating various combinations of cancer drugs and molecular interactions toward developing effective cancer therapy formulations. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据