4.8 Article

Perfusion and characterization of an endothelial cell-seeded modular tissue engineered construct formed in a microfluidic remodeling chamber

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 32, 页码 8254-8261

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.041

关键词

Tissue engineering; Perfusion; Endothelial cells; Activation; VE-cadherin, KLF2, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1; Collagen

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. US National Institutes of Health [EB006903]
  4. Ontario Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue engineered constructs containing tortuous endothelial cell-lined perfusion channels were formed by randomly assembling endothelial cell-seeded submillimeter-sized collagen cylinders (modules) into a microfluidic perfusion chamber. The interconnected void space produced by random module packing created flow channels that were lined with endothelial cells. The effect of perfusion (0.5 mL min(-1), Re* = 27.78 and shear stress = 0.16 dyn cm(-2)) through the tortuous channels on construct remodeling and endothelium quiescence was studied. Over time, modules fused at their points of contact and as they contracted, decreased the internal void space, which reduced the overall perfusion through the construct. As compared to static controls, perfusion caused a transient increase in activation (ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression) after 1 h followed by a decrease after 24 h. Proliferation (by BrdU) was reduced significantly, while KLF2, which is upregulated with atheroprotective laminar shear stress, was upregulated significantly after 24 h. VE-cadherin became discontinuous and was significantly downregulated after 24 h, which was likely caused by the dismantling of the endothelial cell adherens junctions during remodeling. Collectively, these outcomes suggest that flow through the construct did not drive the endothelial cells towards an inflamed, atherosclerotic like disturbed flow pathology. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据