4.8 Article

Biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels based on a self-elimination degradation mechanism

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 26, 页码 6675-6684

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.021

关键词

Degradable crosslinkers; Hydrogel; Michael addition; Self-elimination mechanism

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [U54AR055073]
  3. National Institutes of Health [A1084137]
  4. Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two vinyl sulfone functionalized crosslinkers were developed for the purpose of preparing degradable poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels (EMXL and GABA-EMXL hydrogels). A self-elimination degradation mechanism in which an N-terminal residue of a glutamine is converted to pyroglutamic acid with subsequent release of diamino PEG (DAP) is proposed. The hydrogels were formed via Michael addition by mixing degradable or nondegradable crosslinkers and copolymer {4% w/v; poly[PEG-alt-poly(mercaptosuccinic acid)]) at room temperature in phosphate buffer (PB, pH = 7.4). Hydrogel degradation was characterized by assessing diamino PEG release and examining morphological changes as well as the swelling and weight loss ratio under physiological conditions (37 degrees C). Degradation of EMXL and GABA-EMXL hydrogels occurred by surface erosion (confirmed by SEM). GABA-EMXL degradation was significantly faster (similar to 3-fold) than EMXL; however, the degradation of both hydrogels in mouse plasma was 12-times slower than in PBS. The slower degradation rate in plasma as compared to buffer is consistent with the presence of gamma-glutamyltransferase, gamma-glutamylcyclotransferase and/or glutaminyl cyclase (QC), which have been shown to suppress pyroglutamic acid formation. The current studies suggest that EMXL and GABA-EMXL hydrogels may have biomedical applications where 1-2 week degradation timeframes are optimal. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据