4.8 Article

Covalent immobilisation of tropoelastin on a plasma deposited interface for enhancement of endothelialisation on metal surfaces

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1675-1681

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.009

关键词

Stainless steel; Plasma polymerisation; Endothelialisation; Elastin

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Sydney University Medical Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently available endovascular metallic implants such as stents exhibit suboptimal biocompatibility in that they re-endothelialise poorly leaving them susceptible to thrombosis. To improve the interaction of these implants with endothelial cells we developed a surface coating technology, enabling the covalent attachment of biomolecules to previously inert metal surfaces. Using horseradish peroxidase as a probe, we demonstrate that the polymerised surface can retain the presentation and activity of an immobilised protein. We further demonstrated the attachment of tropoelastin, an extracellular matrix protein critical to the correct arrangement and function of vasculature. Not only it is structurally important, but it plays a major role in supporting endothelial cell growth, while modulating smooth muscle cell infiltration. Tropoelastin was shown to bind to the surface in a covalent monolayer, supplemented with additional physisorbed multilayers on extended incubation. The physisorbed tropoelastin layers can be washed away in buffer or SDS while the first layer of tropoelastin remains tightly bound. The plasma coated stainless steel surface with immobilised tropoelastin was subsequently found to have improved biocompatibility by promoting endothelial cell attachment and proliferation relative to uncoated stainless steel controls. Tropoelastin coatings applied to otherwise inert substrates using this technology could thus have broad applications to a range of non-polymeric vascular devices. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据