4.8 Article

Engineered skeletal muscle tissue networks with controllable architecture

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1401-1412

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.015

关键词

Skeletal myoblasts; Myotube alignment; Rapid prototyping; Myogenesis; Reproducibility

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL080469, R21 HL080469-02, R21 HL080469] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR055226, R01 AR055226-01A1, R01 AR055226] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The engineering of functional skeletal muscle tissue substitutes holds promise for the treatment of various muscular diseases and injuries. However, no tissue fabrication technology currently exists for the generation of a relatively large and thick bioartificial muscle made of densely packed, uniformly aligned, and differentiated myofibers. In this study, we describe a versatile cell/hydrogel micromolding approach where polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds containing an array of elongated posts were used to fabricate relatively large neonatal rat skeletal muscle tissue networks with reproducible and controllable architecture. By combining cell-mediated fibrin gel compaction and precise microfabrication of mold dimensions including the length and height of the PDMS posts, we were able to simultaneously support high cell viability, guide cell alignment along the microfabricated tissue pores, and reproducioly control the overall tissue porosity, size, and thickness. The interconnected muscle bundles within file porous tissue networks were composed of densely packed, aligned, and highly differentiated myofibers. The formed myofibers expressed myogenin, developed abundant cross-striations, and generated spontaneous tissue contractions at the macroscopic spatial scale. The proliferation of non-muscle cells was significantly reduced compared to monolayer cultures. The more complex muscle tissue architectures were fabricated by controlling the spatial distribution and direction of the PDMS posts. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据