4.8 Article

MRI-visible polymeric vector bearing CD3 single chain antibody for gene delivery to T cells for immunosuppression

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1962-1970

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.043

关键词

Immunosuppression; Targeted gene delivery; T cell anergy; Nonviral vector; Magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20474076, 30571769, 20728403, 50673103]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [7003703]
  3. Postdoctoral Foundation of China [20070410250]
  4. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20060558083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene therapy mediated by nonviral vectors provides great advantages over conventional drug therapy in inducing immunosuppression after organ transplantation, yet it was rarely reported because T cells are normally difficult to transfect. In this paper, a nonviral vector that effectively transports genes into T cells is developed by attaching a T cell specific ligand, the CD3 single chain antibody (scAb(CD3)), to the distal ends of poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted polyethylenimine (scAb(CD3)-PEG-g-PEI). This polymer was first complexed with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and was then used to condense plasmid DNA into nanoparticles with an ideally small size and low cytotoxicity. Based on a reporter gene assay, targeting ligand functionalization of the delivery agent leads to 16 fold of enhancement in the gene transfection level in HB8521 cells, a rat T lymphocyte line. This targeting event in cell culture was successfully imaged by MRI scan. Inspiringly, delivery of a therapeutic gene DGK alpha with our MRI-visible delivery agent was likewise efficient, resulting in a 43% inhibition in the stimulated proliferation of HB8521 cells as well as a 38% inhibition in the expression of a major functional cytokine interleukin-2 (IL-2), indicating the effective T cell anergy induced by gene therapy. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据