4.8 Article

Nanostructured biocomposite substrates by electrospinning and electrospraying for the mineralization of osteoblasts

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 2085-2094

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.079

关键词

Electrospinning; Electrospraying; Biocomposite; Hydroxyapatite; Mineralization; Bone tissue engineering

资金

  1. Office of Life Sciences in the National University of Singapore and StemLife Sdn Bhd [50450]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanotechnology has enabled the engineering of nanostructured materials to meet current challenges in bone replacement therapies. Biocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds of poly(L-lactic acid)-co-poly(epsilon-caprolactone), gelatin and hydroxyapatite (HA) were fabricated by combining the electrospinning and electrospraying techniques in order to create a better osteophilic environment for the growth and mineralization of osteoblasts. Electrospraying of HA nanoparticles on electrospun nanofibers helped to attain rough surface morphology ideal for cell attachment and proliferation and also achieve improved mechanical properties than HA blended nanofibers. Nanofibrous scaffolds showed high pore size and porosity up to 90% with fiber diameter in the range of 200-700 nm. Nanofibrous scaffolds were characterized for their functional groups and chemical structure by FTIR and XRD analysis. Studies on cell-scaffold interaction were carried out by culturing human fetal osteoblast cells (hFOB) on both HA blended and sprayed PLACL/Gel scaffolds and assessing their growth, proliferation, mineralization and enzyme activity. The results of MTS, ALP, SEM and ARS studies confirmed, not only did HA sprayed biocomposite scaffolds showed better cell proliferation but also enhanced mineralization and alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) proving that electrospraying in combination with electrospinning produced Superior and more suitable biocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据