4.8 Article

The intracellular effects of non-ionic amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles in the delivery of anticancer drugs

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 374-382

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.035

关键词

Amphiphilic cyclodextrins; Nanoparticles; Docetaxel; Cells

资金

  1. CNR (FUSINT project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to develop nanoparticles made of the amphiphilic cyclodextrin heptakis (2-O-oligo(ethyleneoxide)-6-hexadecylthio-)-beta-CD (SC160H) entrapping docetaxel (Doc) and establish their in vivo potential. Doc-loaded SC160H nanoparticles were prepared by the emulsion-solvent evaporation technique and fully characterized for size, zeta potential, amount of entrapped drug, release rate and degradation rate. Spherical vesicular nanoparticles displaying a hydrodynamic radius of about 95 nm which did not change upon storage as an aqueous dispersion, a negative zeta potential and entrapment efficiency of Doc very close to 100% were produced. DSC study highlighted the crystalline nature of SC160H, unloaded and Doc-loaded SC160H nanoparticles which resulted in their very slow dissolution during release stage and well-modulated release of entrapped Doc for about 8 weeks. Doc-loaded SC160H nanoparticles were not hemolytic toward red blood cells as compared to a commercial Doc formulation (Taxotere (R)) which shows a dose-dependent toxicity. After exposure of HEp-2 cells to equivalent doses of free Doc and Doc-loaded SC160H nanoparticles, superior cell killing and cell damage were observed for nanoparticles. Finally, cell damage was attributed to aberrant mitosis which was found to be significantly higher for HEp-2 cells treated with Doc-loaded SC160H nanoparticles as compared to free Doc likely due to the ability of nanoparticles to slowly release the drug allowing prolonged cell arrest in mitosis. Taken together, these results highlights a great potential of nanoparticles based on SC160H in solid tumors therapy. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据