4.8 Article

Iron oxide nanoparticles as a drug delivery vehicle for MRI monitored magnetic targeting of brain tumors

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 487-496

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.050

关键词

drug delivery; nanoparticle; MRI; magnetism; image analysis

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA114612-05, R01 CA114612, R24 CA083099, R01CA114612] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL055461, R01 HL55461] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS066945, R01 NS066945-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the possibility of utilizing iron oxide nanoparticles as a drug delivery vehicle for minimally invasive, MRI-monitored magnetic targeting of brain tumors. In vitro determined hydrodynamic diameter of similar to 100nm, saturation magnetization of 94 emu/g Fe and T-2 relaxivity of 43 s(-1) mM(-1) of the nanoparticles suggested their applicability for this purpose. In vivo effect of magnetic targeting on the extent and selectivity of nanoparticle accumulation in tumors of rats harboring orthotopic 9L-gliosarcomas was quantified with MRI. Animals were intravenously injected with nanoparticles (12mg Fe/kg) under a magnetic field density of 0T (control) or 0.4 T (experimental) applied for 30 min. MR images were acquired prior to administration of nanoparticles and immediately after magnetic targeting at I It intervals for 4h. Image analysis revealed that magnetic targeting induced a 5-fold increase in the total glioma exposure to magnetic nanoparticles over non-targeted tumors (p = 0.005) and a 3.6-fold enhancement in the target selectivity index of nanoparticle accumulation in glioma over the normal brain (p = 0.025). In conclusion, accumulation of iron oxide nanoparticles in gliosarcomas can be significantly enhanced by magnetic targeting and successfully quantified by MR imaging. Hence, these nanoparticles appear to be a promising vehicle for glioma-targeted drug delivery. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据