4.8 Article

The morphology of anisotropic 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 29, 期 28, 页码 3799-3806

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.012

关键词

hydroxyapatite; image analysis; porosity; scaffold; synchrotron radiation-based micro; computed tomography; three-dimensional-printing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds with tailored pores ranging from the nanometer to millimeter scale can support the reconstruction of centimeter-sized osseous defects. Three-dimensional-printing processes permit the voxel-wise fabrication of scaffolds. The present study rests upon 3D-printing with nanoporous hydroxyapatite granulates. The cylindrical design refers to a hollow bone with higher density at the periphery. The millimeter-wide central channel follows the symmetry axis and connects the perpendicularly arranged micro-pores. Synchrotron radiation-based micro computed tomography has served for the non-destructive characterization of the scaffolds. The 3D data treatments: is essential, since, for example, the two-dimensional distance maps overestimate the mean distances to the material by 33-50% with respect to the 3D analysis. The scaffolds contain 70% micrometer-wide pores that are interconnected. Using virtual spheres, which might be related to the cells migrating along the pores, the central channel remains accessible through the micro-pores for spheres with a diameter of up to (350 +/- 35) mu m. Registering the tomograms with their 3D-printing matrices has yielded the almost isotropic shrinking of (27 +/- 2)% owing to the sintering process. This registration also allows comparing the design and tomographic data in a quantitative manner to extract the quality of the fabricated scaffolds. Histological analysis of the scaffolds seeded with osteogenic-stimulated progenitor cells has confirmed the suitability of the 3D-printed scaffolds for potential clinical applications. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据