4.8 Article

Microporous nanofibrous fibrin-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 29, 期 30, 页码 4091-4099

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.030

关键词

Fibrin; Calcium phosphate; Hydroxyapatite; Bone tissue engineering

资金

  1. NSF [EEC-9872882, EEC-9529161]
  2. School of Dentistry Research Funding
  3. University of Washington [NIH/NIDCR DE15109]
  4. Anandamahidol Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fibrotic response of the body to synthetic polymers limits their success in tissue engineering and other applications. Though porous polymers have demonstrated improved healing, difficulty in controlling their pore sizes and pore interconnections has clouded the understanding of this phenomenon. In this study, a novel method to fabricate natural polymer/calcium phosphate composite scaffolds with tightly controllable pore size, Pore interconnection, and calcium phosphate deposition was developed. Microporous, nanofibrous fibrin scaffolds were fabricated using sphere-templating methods. Composite scaffolds were created by solution deposition of calcium phosphate on fibrin Surfaces OF by direct incorporation of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nHA). The SEM results showed that fibrin scaffolds exhibited a highly porous and interconnected structure. Osteoblast-like cells, obtained from murine calvaria, attached, Spread and showed a polygonal morphology on the Surface of the biomaterial. Multiple cell layers and fibrillar Matrix deposition were observed. Moreover, cells seeded on mineralized fibrin scaffolds exhibited significantly higher alkaline phosphatase activity as well as osteoblast marker gene expression compared to fibrin scaffolds and nHA incorporated fibrin scaffolds (0.25 and 0.5 g). All types of scaffolds were degraded both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, these scaffolds promoted bone formation in a mouse calvarial defect model and the bone formation was enhanced by addition of FhBMP-2. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据