4.8 Article

The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 970-983

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.009

关键词

vascular; bone; sub-micron surface roughness; surface energy; nano-surface roughness; titanium

资金

  1. Directorate For Engineering
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0730906] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quantified contribution of pure nanometer (features less than 100nm in both the lateral and vertical scale) and sub-micron (features larger than 100 nm in the lateral scale) surface structures on the adhesion of vascular (endothelial) and bone (osteoblasts) cells were demonstrated in this study. Compared with flat titanium surfaces, sub-micron surface features led to a 27% increase in surface energy and promoted endothelial cell adhesion density by 200%. In addition, nanometer surface features also led to a 10% increase in surface energy and a 50% increase in endothelial cell adhesion density compared to flat titanium surfaces. Using aligned patterns of such features on titanium, it was clearly identified that both endothelial and bone cells selectively adhered onto sub-micron and nanometer surface features by 400% and 50% more than onto flat regions, respectively. Thus, the surface patterns developed in this study clearly confirmed that sub-micron to nanometer titanium surface features enhanced cytocompatibility properties for both endothelial and bone cells. Although sub-micron features on titanium had the highest surface energy and the greatest cell adhesion densities, nanometer surface features in this study were more efficient surface features increasing both surface energy and cell adhesion more with respect to smaller changes in surface area and surface roughness (compared to sub-micron surface features on titanium which had considerably larger changes in surface area and surface roughness). (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据