4.8 Article

In vitro evaluation of biodegradation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) sponges

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 29, 期 24-25, 页码 3438-3443

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.011

关键词

biodegradability; degradation; porous scaffolds; PLGA sponge; tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evaluation of the degradability Of Porous scaffolds is very important for tissue engineering. A protocol in which the condition is close to the in vivo pH environment was established for in vitro evaluation of biodegradable porous scaffolds. Degradation of PLGA sponges in phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) was evaluated with the protocol. The PLGA sponges degraded with incubation time. For the first 12 weeks, the weight loss increased gradually and then remarkably after 12 weeks. In contrast, the number-average molecular weight (M-n) decreased dramatically for the first 12 weeks and then less markedly after 12 weeks. Thermal analysis showed that the glass transition temperatures (T-g) decreased rapidly for the first 12 weeks, and the change became less evident after 12 weeks. These results suggest that the degradation mechanism of PLGA sponges was dominated by autocatalyzed bulk degradation for the first 12 weeks and then by Surface degradation after 12 weeks. Physical aging was observed during incubation at 37 degrees C. The heterogeneous structure caused by physical aging might be one of the driving forces that induced autocatalyzed bulk degradation. The degradation mechanism was further supported by the data of pH change and the morphology of the degraded PLGA sponges. The autocatalyzed acidic products flooded out after 8 weeks, the pH dropped, and the walls of the sponges became more porous. The increase of the pore surface area facilitated surface degradation after 12 weeks. The pH was in the range between 7.43 and 7.24 during the entire incubation time. The protocol suppressed extreme changes of the pH and will be useful in the biodegradation evaluation of porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据