4.8 Article

The effect of extensible PEG tethers on shielding between grafted thermo-responsive polymer chains and integrin-RGD binding

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 29, 期 27, 页码 3650-3655

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.030

关键词

poly(N-isopropylacrylamide); 2-carboxyisopropylacrylamide; temperature-responsive surface; RGD peptides; affinity control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The affinity control of integrin-RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) binding by a thermal on-off' switch has been achieved using newly designed surfaces presenting grafted temperature-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-2-carboxyisopropylacrylamide) copolymers functionalized with synthetic peptides. The prepared surface was designed to expose the tethered peptides available for cell binding at active on state above the lower critical solution temperature (LCST). The fully extended chains, on the other hand, masked the peptides completely and the cells started to detach from the surfaces at inactive off' sate below the LCST. This paper elucidates the shielding effect of the grafted polymer chains on the dissociation of integrin-RGD binding below the LCST. To assess the ability of the polymer-shielding, extensible poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) tethers were introduced between peptides and the grafted polymers. PEG chains allow peptides to be tethered to surfaces via functional PEG end-groups, leading to active on state even below the LCST. The time required to release cells from the surface was found to be longer when peptides were coupled to an extensible tether ends, suggesting that the surfaces can engender cell attachment through adhesive moieties covalently bound to the free ends of PEG chains. These results indicate that architectural changes on the nanometer length scale are crucial for controlling integrin-RGD binding and one of the main factors causing cell detachment is the shielding effect of the grafted polymer chains. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据