4.8 Article

Silk polymer-based adenosine release: Therapeutic potential for epilepsy

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 29, 期 26, 页码 3609-3616

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.010

关键词

silk; controlled drug release; drug delivery; adenosine; epilepsy; brain

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS061844, R01NS058780] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS061844, R01 NS058780, R01NS058780, R01 NS058780-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine augmentation therapies (AAT) make rational use of the brain's own adenosine-based seizure control system and hold promise for the therapy of refractory epilepsy. In an effort to develop an AAT compatible with future clinical application, we developed a novel silk protein-based release system for adenosine. Adenosine releasing brain implants with target release doses of 0, 40, 200, and 1000 ng adenosine per day were prepared by embedding adenosine containing microspheres into nanofilm-coated silk fibroin scaffolds. In vitro, the respective polymers released 0, 33.4, 170.5, and 819.0 ng adenosine per day over 14 days. The therapeutic potential of the implants was validated in a dose-response study in the rat model of kindling epileptogenesis. Four days prior to the onset of kindling, adenosine releasing polymers were implanted into the infrahippocampal cleft and progressive acquisition of kindled seizures was monitored over a total of 48 stimulations. We document a dose-dependent retardation of seizure acquisition. In recipients of polymers releasing 819 ng adenosine per day, kindling epileptogenesis was delayed by one week corresponding to 18 kindling stimulations. Histological analysis of brain samples confirmed the correct location of implants and electrodes. We conclude that silk-based delivery of around 1000 ng adenosine per day is a safe and efficient strategy to suppress seizures. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据