4.7 Article

Economic viability of biogas energy production from family-sized digesters in Uganda

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 26-39

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.008

关键词

Biogas energy; Economic viability; Family-sized; Fixed-dome digesters; Uganda

资金

  1. Swedish International Development Corporation (Sida)/SAREC under Makerere University [_100004441]
  2. Swedish International Development Corporation (Sida)/SAREC under Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) [_100004441]
  3. UK Department for International Development (DFID) New and Emerging Technologies Research Call [_501100000278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biogas is among the renewable energies being evaluated to augment traditional energy in Uganda. Its development remains low, partly because of lack of information on its economic viability. Based on primary data from Central and Eastern Uganda, this study assesses economic viability of biogas energy production in Uganda. The empirical results show that biogas energy production is economically viable with a payback period of 1.17, 1.08 and 1.01 years for 8 m(3), 12 m(3) and 16 m(3) biogas plants, respectively. The positive net present values of 4500$, 7000$ and 9500$ for 8 m(3), 12 m(3) and 16 m(3) plants, respectively, show that biogas systems are economically viable. The most profitable levels were determined through sensitivity and break- even analysis. The cost structure of the biogas systems offers useful guidelines to households about which levels they should operate in order to remain economically viable. The annual interest rates at which households should borrow to invest in biogas systems and remain economically viable should not exceed 36%, 37% and 39% for 8 m(3), 12 m(3) and 16 m(3) plants. The study reveals that the viability of biogas is greatly affected by variation in discount rates, capital and operating and maintenance costs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据