4.6 Article

Short-term exposure to air pollution in a road tunnel enhances the asthmatic response to allergen

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 716-724

出版社

MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15d15.x

关键词

allergen challenge; allergic asthma; nitrogen dioxide; particles; road tunnel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to assess whether air pollution in road tunnels would promote asthmatic reactions in persons with mild allergic asthma. Twenty volunteers with mild allergic asthma were exposed, inside a car, for 30 min in a Stockholm city road tunnel. As a control, the subjects were exposed to much lower pollution levels in a suburban area. Four hours after the exposure, the subjects inhaled a low dose of allergen. Asthmatic reaction during the early phase was measured as the increase in specific airway resistance 15 min after allergen inhalation and during the Late phase as the decrease in lung function forced expiratory volume in one second 3-10 h after allergen inhalation, Asthma symptoms and drug use were monitored up to 18 h after allergen inhalation. The median nitrogen dioxide level during exposure was 313 mu g.m(-3) (range 203-462). The median levels of particles with 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameters of 10 (PM10) and 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) were 170 (range 103-613) and 95 (range 61-218) mu g.m(-3) respectively. Subjective symptoms during tunnel exposure were not pronounced. However, subjects exposed to tunnel NO2 Levels of greater than or equal to 300 mu g.m(-3) had a significantly greater early reaction, following allergen exposure, as well as lower lung function and more asthma symptoms during the late phase, compared to control. Also, subjects with PM2.5 exposure greater than or equal to 100 mu g.m(-3) had a slightly increased early reaction compared to control. In conclusion, exposure to air pollution in road tunnels may significantly enhance asthmatic reactions to subsequently inhaled allergens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据