4.7 Article

Grinding energy and physical properties of chopped and hammer-milled barley, wheat, oat, and canola straws

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 58-67

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.10.011

关键词

Agricultural straws; Chopper; Hammer mill; Grinding energy; Physical and flow properties

资金

  1. Cellulosic Biofuel Network (CBioN) of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  2. Office of Biomass Program of the U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, specific energy for grinding and physical properties of wheat, canola, oat and barley straw grinds were investigated. The initial moisture content of the straw was about 0.13-0.15 (fraction total mass basis). Particle size reduction experiments were conducted in two stages: (1) a chopper without a screen, and (2) a hammer mill using three screen sizes (19.05, 25.4, and 31.75 mm). The lowest grinding energy (1.96 and 2.91 kWh t (1)) was recorded for canola straw using a chopper and hammer mill with 19.05-mm screen size, whereas the highest (3.15 and 8.05 kWh t (1)) was recorded for barley and oat straws. The physical properties (geometric mean particle diameter, bulk, tapped and particle density, and porosity) of the chopped and hammer-milled wheat, barley, canola, and oat straw grinds measured were in the range of 0.98-4.22 mm, 36-80 kg m (3), 49-119 kg m (3), 600-1220 kg m (3), and 0.9-0.96, respectively. The average mean particle diameter was highest for the chopped wheat straw (4.22-mm) and lowest for the canola grind (0.98-mm). The canola grinds produced using the hammer mill (19.05-mm screen size) had the highest bulk and tapped density of about 80 and 119 kg m (3); whereas, the wheat and oat grinds had the lowest of about 58 and 88-90 kg m (3). The results indicate that the bulk and tapped densities are inversely proportional to the particle size of the grinds. The flow properties of the grinds calculated are better for chopped straws compared to hammer milled using smaller screen size (19.05 mm). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据