4.7 Article

Porous structure and morphology of granular chars from flash and conventional pyrolysis of grape seeds

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 123-132

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.020

关键词

Biomass; Pyrolysis; Microporous carbon; Char; Vitis vinifera

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTQ2009-09983]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work studies the influence of the operating conditions used in the pyrolysis of grape seeds on the morphology and textural properties of the chars resulting. Flash and conventional (283 K min(-1) heating rate) pyrolysis have been used within a wide range of temperature (300-1000 degrees C). The effect of a pretreatment for oil extraction has also been studied. The porous structure of the chars was characterized by adsorption of N-2 at 77K, Ar at 77K and 87K, and CO2 at 273 K and mercury intrusion porosimetry. The morphology was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. All the materials prepared revealed an essentially microporous structure, with a poor or even negligible contribution of mesopores. Increasing pyrolysis temperature led to higher specific surface areas and lower pore size. The highest specific surface area values occurred within 700-800 degrees C, reaching up to 500 m(2) g (1) with pore sizes in the 0.4-1.1 nm range. No significant morphological changes were observed upon carbonization so that the resulting chars were granular materials of similar size than the starting grape seeds. The hollow core structure of the chars, with most of the material allocated at the periphery of the granules can help to overcome the mass transfer limitations of most common (solid or massive) granular activated carbons. The chars showed a good mechanical strength during attrition tests. These chars can be potential candidates for the preparation of granular carbons molecular sieve or activated carbons raw materials. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据