4.6 Article

Model of blood-brain transfer of oxygen explains nonlinear flow-metabolism coupling during stimulation of visual cortex

期刊

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200004000-00012

关键词

cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen; cerebral blood flow; oxidativity index; positron emission tomography; visual cortex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coupling between cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)) and blood flow (CBF) in response to visual stimulation was evaluated by means of a model of oxygen delivery. The model predicted a nonlinear relationship between stimulus-evoked changes of oxygen consumption and blood flow. The magnitude of the CMRO(2)/CBF ratio index (I(O2)) was used to indicate the degree of flow-metabolism coupling prevailing in specific areas of the brain during physiological stimulation. Therefore, the index provided a measure of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance contrast. To evaluate the changes of I(O2) in response to visual stimulation, the model was applied to the effect of a changing flicker rate of a visual stimulus on the magnitudes of CBF, CMRO(2), and oxygen diffusion capacity, in the human brain. Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to measure the CBF and the CMRO(2) in 12 healthy volunteers who viewed a cross-hair (baseline) or a yellow-blue annular checkerboard reversing at frequencies of 1, 4, or 8 Hz. The magnitude of CBF in the primary visual cortex increased as a function of the checkerboard reversal rate and reached a maximum at the frequency of 8 Hz (z = 16.0), while the magnitude of CMRO(2) reached a maximum at 4 Hz (z = 4.0). Therefore, the calculated I(O2) was lower at 8 Hz than at 1 and 4 Hz, in contrast to the oxidative metabolic rate that reached its maximum at 4 Hz. The model explained the increase of oxygen consumption as the combined effect of increased blood flow and increased oxygen diffusion capacity in the region of visual activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据