4.8 Article

In-situ study of the promotional effect of chlorine on the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis with Ru/Al2O3

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 177-186

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.10.008

关键词

Ruthenium; Fischer-Tropsch; In situ DRIFT; Chlorine; Promoter

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  2. Formacion de Profesorado Universitario program (FPU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of the addition of Cl to Ru/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis has been investigated. A series of four catalysts containing 3 wt.% of Ru supported on gamma-Al2O3 and promoted with different amounts of chlorine (Cl/Ru atomic ratios of 0, 1, 5 and 10) has been prepared. The catalysts were tested in the Fischer Tropsch synthesis in a fixed bed reactor. The initial rates for the CO hydrogenation increase with the increasing amount of Cl in the catalyst. However, at the steady-state all catalysts exhibit similar Fischer Tropsch yields, irrespectively of their initial amount of Cl. The nature of the CO adsorption sites in the Cl-promoted Ru/Al2O3 catalysts has been studied by means of DRIFT concluding that Cl addition leads to a higher fraction of COad species adsorbed on Ru atoms with low coordination numbers. In addition, the stability of such COad species, characterized by high frequency bands in the IR, increases with the increasing content of Cl in the catalysts. The reactivity of the COad species in hydrogen atmospheres and under FTS environments has been studied by in situ MS-DRIFT. We have observed that low-coordinated Ru atoms are more reactive for CO dissociation than those in a higher coordination environment. However, the former sites are prone to deactivation during FTS catalysis, at the steady-state, and only CO adsorbed on highly coordinated Ru atoms is observed in the IR spectra. Consequently, all catalysts exhibit the same reaction rates at the steady-state. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据