4.7 Article

The potential of willow and poplar plantations as carbon sinks in Sweden

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 86-95

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.012

关键词

Afforestation; Carbon sequestration; Short-rotation plantations; Salix; Populus

资金

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Swedish Research Council Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large share, estimated at 12-25%, of the annual anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is attributed to global deforestation. Increasing the forested areas therefore has a positive impact on carbon (C) sequestration and mitigation of high atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Fast-growing species, such as willow and poplar, are of high interest as producers of biomass for fuel, but also as C sinks. The present study estimated the rate of C sequestration in biomass and soil in willow and poplar plantations. Calculations were based on above- and below-ground biomass production data from field experiments, including fine root turnover, litter decomposition rates, and production levels from commercial plantations. Accumulation of C in woody biomass, above and below ground, was estimated at 76.6-80.1 Mg C ha(-1) and accumulation of C in the soil at 9.0-10.3 Mg C ha(-1) over the first 20-22 years. The average rates of C sequestration were 3.5-4.0 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) in woody biomass, and 0.4-0.5 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) in the soil. If 400,000 ha of abandoned arable land in Sweden were planted with willow and poplar, about 1.5 Tg C would be sequestered annually in woody biomass and 0.2 Tg C in soils. This would be nearly one tenth of the annual anthropogenic emissions of C in Sweden today. These calculations show the potential of fast-growing plantations on arable land to mitigate the effect of high CO2 concentrations over a short time span. Knowledge gaps were found during the calculation process and future research areas were suggested. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据