4.7 Article

Fuel quality changes in full tree logging residue during storage in roadside slash piles in Northwestern Ontario

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 43-50

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.015

关键词

Ash content; Bioenergy; Fuel quality; Gross calorific value; Moisture content; Northwestern Ontario

资金

  1. Ontario Centres of Excellence
  2. Ontario Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure
  3. Thunder Bay Economic Development Commission
  4. AbitibiBowater Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The procurement of logging residue for energy production can be uneconomical due to high moisture content and low gross calorific value. High moisture content in biomass lowers the energy density and transportation becomes less efficient. Logging residue, from full tree logging operations stored in roadside beehive and windrow piles, were examined to determine the effect of storage method and duration on fuel quality in northwestern Ontario, Canada. The fuel attributes assessed were moisture content, gross calorific value and ash content. Windrows displayed lower moisture content than beehives. Softwoods generally displayed lower moisture content and higher gross calorific values than hardwoods. Smaller diameter stems displayed higher gross calorific value and ash content than larger diameter stems. The moisture content (green basis) reduced from a green state to 15.1% after two years of storage in roadside slash piles, whereas gross calorific value and ash content did not change significantly with storage time. The gross calorific values ranged from 19.5 to 23.1 MJ kg (1) and the ash content ranged from 0.4% to 8.4% for all species, components and storage years. The study demonstrates that the storage regime plays a significant role on the fuel quality of logging residue. Proper storage and drying techniques improve the fuel quality and net energy yield from logging residue biomass, thereby leading to an overall cost reduction of the biomass feedstock. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据