4.6 Article

Inhibitory effects of nitric oxide and gamma interferon on in vitro and in vivo replication of Marek's disease virus

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 3605-3612

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.74.8.3605-3612.2000

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The replication of Marek's disease herpesvirus (MDV) and herpesvirus of turkeys (HVT) in chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) cultures was inhibited by the addition of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine, a nitric oxide (NO)-generating compound, in a dose-dependent manner, Treatment of CEF culture, prepared from 11-day-old embryos, with recombinant chicken gamma interferon (rChIFN-gamma) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) resulted in production of NO which was suppressed by the addition of N-G-monomethyl L-arginine (NMMA), an inhibitor of inducible NO synthase (iNOS), Incubation of CEF cultures for 72 h prior to treatment with rChIFN-gamma plus LPS was required for optimal NO production. Significant differences in NO production were observed in CEF derived from MDV-resistant N2a (major histocompatibility complex [MHC], (BB21)-B-21) and MDV-susceptible S-13 (MHC, (BB13)-B-13) and P2a (MHC, (BB19)-B-19) chickens. N2a-derived CEF produced NO earlier and at higher levels than CEF from the other two lines. The lowest production of NO was detected in P2a-derived CEF, NO production in chicken splenocyte cultures followed a similar pattern, with the highest levels of NO produced in cultures from N2a chickens and the fewest levels produced in cultures from P2a chickens, Replication of MDV and HVT was significantly inhibited in CEF cultures treated with rChIFN-gamma plus LPS and producing NO. The addition of NMMA to CEF treated with rChIFN-gamma plus LPS reduced the inhibition. MDV infection of chickens treated with S-methylisothiourea, an inhibitor of iNOS, resulted in increased virus load compared to nontreated chickens, These results suggest that NO may play an important role in control of MDV replication in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据