4.7 Article

Ethanol production from steam-pretreated sweet sorghum bagasse with high substrate consistency enzymatic hydrolysis

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 157-164

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.022

关键词

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench; Separate hydrolysis and fermentation; Simultaneous saccharification fermentation; High substrate consistency; Ethanol production

资金

  1. Education Department of Sichuan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification fermentation (SSF) with high substrate consistency (the mass fraction: 12%) were performed with the steam-pretreated sweet sorghum bagasse (SSB). Fermentation ability of four yeast strains and influences of residual solids after hydrolysis on fermentation were investigated in SHF. Meanwhile, influences of inorganic salts on fermentation were assessed to determine their suitable supplementations for ethanol production. Additionally, influences of initial yeast inoculation on SHF and SSF were further investigated. The results showed the adopted yeast strain, Tembec 1, displayed the best fermentation performance on the hydrolysate of pretreated SSB, and the residual solids in hydrolysate had negligible influences on ethanol fermentation. Although the deficiency or overdose of (NH4)(2)HPO4 or MgSO4 center dot 7H(2)O could reduce ethanol yield in SHF, the suitable supplementation of (NH4)(2)HPO4 (0.5 g L (1)) and MgSO4 center dot 7H(2)O (1.0 g L (1)) could increase ethanol yield by 5.2% and 8.3%, respectively. The initial yeast inoculation of 3 g L (1) could satisfy both SSF and SHF, which achieved 63.8% and 57.9% ethanol yield of theoretical one with final ethanol concentration of 23.3 g L (1) and 21.2 g L (1), respectively. In addition, ethanol yield kept almost constant as yeast was inoculated from 3 to 5 g L (1) in SHF, whereas it decreased significantly in SSF. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据