4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A new mechanism for anti-inflammatory actions of proton pump inhibitors - inhibitory effects on neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 74-81

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.014s1074.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions mediated by adhesion molecules may be involved in gastric mucosal inflammation associated with Helicobacter pylori or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Aim: To investigate the effects of proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (HRA) on neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesive interactions induced by H. pylori water extract (HPE) or interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta). Methods: Human peripheral neutrophils and umbilical vein endothelial cells were incubated with either proton pump inhibitors (lansoprazole and omeprazole) or HRA (famotidine and ranitidine). Neutrophil surface expression of CD11b and CD18 and endothelial cell intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) were assessed by now cytometry and an enzyme immunoassay, respectively. Neutrophil adherence was defined as the ratio of exogenous neutrophils that adhered to the endothelial monolayers. Results: The expression of CD11b and CD18 on neutrophils and neutrophil-dependent adhesion to endothelial cells elicited by HPE were inhibited by lansoprazole and omeprazole at clinical relevant doses, and the expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on endothelial cells and endothelial-dependent neutrophil adherence induced by IL-1 beta were also inhibited by lansoprazole and omeprazole at similar doses. Famotidine and ranitidine had neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions. Conclusions: These results indicate that proton pump inhibitors can attenuate neutrophil adherence to endothelial cells via inhibiting the expression of adhesion molecules, suggesting that proton pump inhibitors may have anti-inflammatory activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据