4.7 Article

Pyrolysis of black cumin seed cake in a fixed-bed reactor

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 4297-4304

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.019

关键词

Bio-oil; Pyrolysis; Black cumin seed cake; Biomass energy; Characterization

资金

  1. Selcuk University Scientific Research Projects Council [06101004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The black cumin seed cake (BCSC) is a by-product obtained from the black cumin seeds with cold pressing. This by-product can be utilized as a biomass feedstock for conversion to bio-oil with pyrolysis process. The BCSC samples were initially pyrolyzed on a lab-scale pyrolysis system at different values in the ranges of 300-800 degrees C and 0.050-0.300 L min(-1) to determine the effects of operation temperature and N-2 flow rate on the yields on products, respectively. Then, the bio-oil in the highest yield (wB = 44.37%) which was obtained at pyrolysis final temperature (450 degrees C) temperature, heating rate (35 degrees C min(-1)) particle size (dp > 850 mu m), and sweeping flow rate of 0.200 L min(-1) was characterized by Fourier Transform infra-red (FT-IR) spectroscopy, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and column chromatography. Consequently, it was shown that the operating temperature and N-2 gas flow rate parameters were effective on the product yields. Also, the important some physico-chemical properties of the pyrolytic oil obtained in high yield were determined as the calorific value of 38.48 MJ kg(-1), the empirical formula of CH1.651O0.105N0.042S0.001, the rich chemical content containing many different chemical groups, and the density of 970.25 kg m(-3), and the viscosity of 63.42 mm(2) s(-1). Based on the determined properties of the pyrolytic oil, it was decided that the use of pyrolytic oil derived from the BCSC may possible be for the production of the alternative liquid fuels and finely chemicals after the necessary improvements. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据