4.7 Article

Biomass and energy yield of industrial hemp grown for biogas and solid fuel

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 3040-3049

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.006

关键词

Harvesting date; Cannabis sativa L.; Energy crop; Biogas substrate; Straw fuel; Dry matter yield

资金

  1. Alnarp at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  2. Lunds Energi AB
  3. Environmental Fund of Region Skane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the energy yield of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivated for energy purposes under cold climate conditions in Northern Europe. Split-plot field trials were carried out over three consecutive years to investigate different nitrogen fertilisation regimes. Dry matter yield per hectare, moisture content, hydrogen content and heating value were determined at roughly monthly intervals from July until the following spring every season. The energy yield was calculated and adjusted for a fair comparison with those of other energy crops commonly grown in the study region. Two harvest periods for optimal energy yield have been determined; harvest in September to October, when the hemp is used for biogas production, yielded 14.4 Mg ha(-1) and 296 GJ ha(-1); harvest in February to April, when the hemp is used as a solid fuel, yielded 9.9 Mg ha(-1) and 246 GJ ha(-1). For biogas production, the adjusted biomass energy yield of hemp was similar to that of maize and sugar beet and 24 and 14% greater than that of lucerne and clover-grass ley, respectively. As a solid fuel, the adjusted biomass energy yield of hemp was 120% higher than that of wheat straw and similar to that of reed canary grass. Annual variations in dry matter yield depending on weather conditions and sowing dates exceeded variations due to nitrogen fertilisation. Hemp is suitable as an energy crop in cold climate regions of Northern Europe, as it has similar or often higher energy yields than other common energy crops grown in these regions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据