4.7 Article

Mixotrophic cultivation of Botryococcus braunii

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 1710-1715

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.002

关键词

Botryococcus braunii; Mixotrophic cultivation; Glucose; Photobioreactor; Hydrocarbon

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB200904]
  2. National High Technical Development Project (863 Project) [2007AA02Z209, 2007AA09Z419]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering [2060204]
  4. Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Exploitation and Preservation of Coastal Bio-resource [2010F30003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cultivation of Botryococcus braunii has been mainly reported in photoautotrophic mode which has some disadvantages such as low cell growth rate and low cell density. For high density and high productivity, this study attempts to cultivate B. braunii in mixotrophic mode. Effects of different organic carbon sources (including maltose, glucose, saccharose, lactose, glycerol and starch), glucose and KNO(3) concentrations as well as inoculation amount on the growth of B. braunii were investigated in 250 mL shake flasks, and a fed-batch mixotrophic cultivation technique was developed in a 10 L enclosed automatic air-lift photobioreactor. B. braunii grew faster in mixotrophic cultivation with all the six organic carbon sources than that in photoautotrophic mode, and glucose was the optimum. The optimal concentrations of glucose and KNO(3) were 2.5 g L(-1) and 0.4 g L(-1) respectively. Within the inoculums of 46-200 g m(-3), the lag phase of cell growth was very short, and cells grew fast into exponential phase after inoculation, the average cell growth rate of B. braunii increased with the increment of inoculation amount. With a 10 L air-lift photobioreactor, B. braunii was cultured by feeding glucose under mixotrophic condition for 19 days, and the cell density and hydrocarbon content in dry cell reached 4.55 g L(-1) and 29.7%, respectively. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据