4.8 Article

The preparation and evaluation of poly(ε-caprolactone) microparticles containing both a lipophilic and a hydrophilic drug

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 429-438

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00253-9

关键词

poly(epsilon-caprolactone); microparticles; solvent evaporation method; propranolol HCl; nifedipine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An original dosage form for oral delivery based on the encapsulation of both, lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs, in poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) microparticles prepared either by the oil-in-water (o/w) or the water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) solvent evaporation method was developed. Microparticles were characterized in terms of morphology, size, encapsulation efficiency and drug release. The physical state of the drugs and the polymer was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray powder diffractometry, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Nifedipine (calcium antagonist) and propranolol HCl (beta-blocker), used for the treatment of hypertension, were chosen as lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. The microparticles were spherical with diameters in the range of 191-351 mu m by the o/w-method, and in the range of 302-477 mu m by the w/o/w-method. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) was 91% for nifedipine and 37% for propranolol HCl with the o/w-method, and 83% for nifedipine and 57% for propranolol HCl with the w/o/w-method. DSC and X-ray diffraction studies showed that PCL maintained its semi-crystalline structure, while the drugs were either dispersed or dissolved in the polymer. In vitro release studies revealed a controlled release of nifedipine and propranolol HCl from microparticles prepared by the o/w-method; a burst release of propranolol HCl was observed from microparticles prepared by the w/o/w-method. In conclusion, microparticles containing both a hydrophilic and a lipophilic drug were successfully prepared. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据