4.7 Article

Grain size and temperature dependence of superplastic deformation in an Al-Mg alloy under isostructural condition

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 1207-1224

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00445-0

关键词

constitutive equations; creep and superplasticity; aluminum alloys; high temperature mechanical behavior; dislocation creep

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical behavior of a superplastic Al-4.7% Mg-0.8% Mn-0.4% Cu alloy has been characterized by a new type of step strain-rate test which preserves the initial microstructure of the alloy (i.e. an isostructural test). Four different grain sizes of the alloy (8-30 mu m), prepared by variations in thermomechanical processing practice, were examined. A sigmoidal relationship between log sigma and log epsilon is observed for each isostructural condition. The value of maximum m (= dlog sigma/dlog epsilon) increased with increasing temperature and with decreasing grain size. The isostructural log sigma vs log epsilon data are evaluated using the grain mantle based quantitative model proposed by Ghosh. In the dislocation creep region (epsilon > 10(-1)/s), the stress exponent is 4.55 and activation energy is close to that for lattice self-diffusion, but the grain size exponent is non-zero (similar to 0.37). In the grain mantle deformation region (epsilon <10(-3)/s), the value of the stress exponent based on effective stress (sigma - sigma(0), where sigma(0) is threshold stress) is similar to 1.7, and the grain size exponent is 2.3; but interestingly activation energy is the same as that for dislocation creep. Grain mantle creep is now also believed to be controlled by dislocation glide and climb processes, but its rate is enhanced many times due to a high concentration of vacancies near grain boundaries. sigma(0) computed based on the model shows that it increases with increasing grain size and with decreasing temperature. (C) 2000 Acta Metallurgica Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据