4.6 Article

A comparative study of calf thymus DNA binding to Cr(III) and Cr(VI) ions - Evidence for the guanine N-7-chromium-phosphate chelate formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 14, 页码 10150-10153

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10150

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromium(VI) salts are well known to be mutagens and carcinogens and to easily cross the cell membranes. Because they are powerful oxidizing agents, Cr(VD reacts with intracellular materials to reduce to trivalent form, which binds DNA. This study was designed to investigate the interaction of calf thymus DNA with Cr(VI) and Cr(IPI) in aqueous solution at pH 6.5-7.5, using Cr(VI)/DNA(P) molar ratios (r) of 1:20 to 2:1 and Cr(III)/DNA(P) molar ratios (r) of 1:80 to 1:2, W-visible and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopic methods were used to determine the metal ion-binding sites, binding constants, and the effect of cation complexation on DNA secondary structure. Spectroscopic results showed no interaction of Cr(VI) with DNA at low anion concentrations (r = 1:20 to 1:1), whereas some perturbations of DNA bases and backbone phosphate were observed at very high Cr(VI) contents (r > 1) with overall binding constant of K = 508 M-1. Cr(III) chelates DNA via guanine N-7 and the nearest PO2 group with overall binding constant of K = 3.15 x 10(3) m(-1) Evidence for cation chelate formation comes from major shiftings and intensity variations of the guanine band at 1717 and the phosphate asymmetric stretching vibration at 1222 cm(-1), At low Cr(III) concentration (r = 1:40), the number of Cr(III) ions bound to DNA were 6-7 cations/500 base pairs, and this increased to 30-35 cations/500 base pairs at high metal ion content (r = 1:4), DNA condensation occurred at high cation concentration (r = 1:10). No major alteration of DNA conformation was observed, and the biopolymer remained in the B family structure upon chromium complexation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据