4.6 Article

Tolerance induced by bone marrow chimerism prevents transplant vascular sclerosis in a rat model of small bowel transplant chronic rejection

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 69, 期 7, 页码 1295-1303

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200004150-00015

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The major impediment to success in solid organ transplantation is chronic rejection (CR), The characteristic lesion of CR is transplant vascular sclerosis (TVS), Although the mechanism of TVS is thought to have an immunologic basis, in humans immunosuppression does not prevent or reverse it. One possible therapy to prevent TVS is induction of donor-specific tolerance. Bone marrow chimerism has been successful in inducing tolerance in acute and chronic rejection heart and kidney transplant models. The highly immunogenic small bowel (SB) allograft provides a rigorous test of the efficacy of this tolerance regimen. We examined whether induction of tolerance by bone marrow chimerism could prevent TVS in a model of Fisher 344 (F344) to Lewis (LEW) rat SB transplantation. Methods. Bone marrow chimeras (BMC) were created by transplantation of T-cell-depleted F344 bone marrow into irradiated LEW rats. Chimerism was assessed by flow cytometric method. F344 SB, heterotopically transplanted into the chimeras, was clinically and histologically assessed for CR. F344 SB grafts, transplanted into cyclosporine-A-treated LEW recipients, served as control grafts for CR. Results. Cyclosporine-A-treated LEW rats chronically rejected F344 SB grafts. By contrast, the BMC group demonstrated tolerance and had long-term SB graft survival (>120 days) without TVS. The BMC demonstrated immunocompetence by prompt rejection of third party ACI (RT1(av1)) SB allografts. Conclusions. Bone marrow chimerism prevents chronic graft failure secondary to TVS in a model of chronic SB rejection. TVS fails to develop when tolerance is established, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in TVS are, in part, immunologically mediated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据