4.3 Article

Neuronal and vascular biomarkers in syringomyelia: investigations using longitudinal MR1

期刊

BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 113-124

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/17520363.2.2.113

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; neurotrauma; post-traumatic syringomyelia; spinal cord; spinal cord injury; syringomyelia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Syringomyelia is a formation of fluid-filled cavities in the spinal cord, caused by a number of situations including trauma. To understand the origin and progression of syringomyelia, animal models were developed to mimick the condition and computer models were implemented for performing numerical analysis. This article characterizes the neuropathological stages of a contused spinal cord before and after the syringomyelia formation using longitudinal in vivo MRI. Materials & methods: Rat was subject to a contusion-type spinal cord injury (SCI) at the T12 level. MRI data were gathered on post-injury days 3, 14, 28, 72, 94 and 404 using a 9.4 T scanner. In addition, neurobehavioral tests were performed prior to the scans on these days. Results: Pathological consequences of SO included significant edema and, to a lesser degree, hemorrhage in the acute phase, followed by neuronal loss, tissue alterations and vascular changes in the late stages. The images from the post-injury day 14 indicated shrinkage of the injured tissue and occlusion of the central canal. Subsequently, syringomyelia was initiated cranial to the occlusion and the fluid-filled cavities enlarged with time. The neurologic deficits of the injured rat also worsened overtime. Conclusion: The inflammatory, but not the hemostatic, component seems to be a prerequisite for syringomyelia proceeding contusive SO and abnormal flow of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is likely the main factor. Bioimaging markers from high-resolution MRI sensitized to inflammation and CSF flow may be used for early detection of syringomyelia and assessing its prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据