4.7 Article

Evidence of a north-south asymmetry in the heliosphere associated with a southward displacement of the heliospheric current sheet

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 533, 期 2, 页码 1084-1089

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/308685

关键词

cosmic rays; Sun : magnetic fields

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence of a north-south asymmetry in the global heliosphere, first inferred from Ulysses cosmic-ray observations, is investigated using simultaneous Ulysses and Wind magnetic field observations. Such an asymmetry, presumably associated with a southward displacement of the heliospheric current sheet (HCS), is expected to produce significantly different magnitudes of the radial field component, /B-R/, in the Sun's north and south magnetic hemispheres or, alternatively, in the positive and negative magnetic sectors. Ulysses, while at high latitudes, spends time predominantly in first one and then the other hemisphere. As a consequence, measurements in the positive sector are obtained several months later than measurements made in the negative sector, making comparisons susceptible to temporal changes. To address this ambiguity, the fields in both sectors observed by the Wind spacecraft in the ecliptic were compared. A large difference in /B-R/ of approximate to 30% was observed at Wind between 1994 December and 1995 April, with /B-R/ larger in the south than in the north. Subsequent measurements show a gradual increase in the north (outward) radial component and a decrease in the south (inward) component, ending in only a small difference by 1995 June. Thus, the Wind observations are consistent with a southward displacement of the HCS of approximate to 10 degrees and with the energetic particle observations. The secular time variation, which occurred as the spacecraft transited from the south to the north hemisphere, explains why a significant north-south difference in /B-R/ was not evident in the Ulysses measurements. The current sheet configuration and various questions and implications associated with these results are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据