4.6 Article

Comparative studies of two transthyretin variants with protective effects on familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy: TTR R104H and TTR T119M

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2554

关键词

amyloidosis; familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP); transthyretin (TTR); thyroxine binding; stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently a new nonpathogenic transthyretin (TTR) variant-TTR R104H (TTR H104)-has been described in heterozygotic and compound heterozygotic individuals from a Japanese family with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP). The compound heterozygotic individual, a carrier of TTR V30M (TTR M30) and TTR R104H (TTR M30/H104) presented a very mild form of FAP with slow progression of the disease. TTR and retinol binding protein (RBP) levels were found to be increased in serum from TTR H104 carriers. These characteristics are very similar to those found in compound heterozygotic carriers of TTR V30M-T119M (TTR M30/M119). To structurally compare these variants, we performed stability and thyroxine (T-4) binding studies. TTR M30/H104 showed an increased resistance to dissociation into monomers similar to TTR M30/M119. This suggests that the His104 substitution has the same stabilizing effect on tetrameric TTR as the Met119 substitution. Concerning T-4 binding, TTR H104 presents a T-4 binding affinity lower than that of TTR M119, but still higher than normal TTR, However, TTR from the compound heterozygotic carrier of TTR M30/H104 presented a T-4 binding affinity lower than normal. The results indicate that the His 104 substitution induces structural alterations that increase the stability of the tetramer in compound heterozygotes for TTR M30 despite a lower affinity for T-4 binding. Thus, stability of TTR and binding affinity for T-4 may not be related. More detailed characterization of these variants is needed to clarify the structural alterations responsible for their increased stability. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据