4.6 Article

Determination of chlorophenoxy acid herbicides in water by in situ esterification followed by in-vial liquid-liquid extraction combined with large-volume on-column injection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 877, 期 1-2, 页码 153-166

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00242-9

关键词

water analysis; environmental analysis; large-volume injection; derivatization, GC; extraction methods; chlorophenoxy acids; phenoxy acids; pesticides; dimethyl sulphate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach for rapidly analysing chlorophenoxy acid herbicides in water is presented. The chlorinated acids are derivatised with dimethyl sulphate in the water sample itself (800 mu l) and, next, the methyl esters are extracted with 800 yl of n-hexane. A 200-mu l volume of the extract is injected into the GC-MS system. The miniaturisation of both the methylation and extraction steps could be implemented because of the use of large-volume on-column injection and mass spectrometric detection. The optimisation of the methylation reaction for the simultaneous determination of (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxy)benzoic acid. (2-methyl-3-chlorophenoxy)- and (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acids, (+/-)-2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)- and 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propanoic acids and 4-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)- and 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acids showed that tetrabutylammonium salts act as catalysts. Addition of sodium hydroxide was required to obtain quantitative reaction yields for 4-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)- and 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acids. The methylation-cum-en traction procedure takes only 3 min per sample for a batch of seven samples. Linear calibration plots were obtained for the complete procedure and the limits of detection were of 10-60 ng/l with a signal-to-noise ratio (SIN) of 6. Relative standard deviations ranged from 8 to 15% (n=7) for analyte concentrations of 0.5 mu g/l in surface water. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据