4.6 Article

Conceptualizing menopause and midlife: Chinese American and Chinese women in the US

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 11-23

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5122(00)00090-6

关键词

menopause; midlife; Chinese American women; Chinese women

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [U01 AG12505, U01 AG12531, U01 AG12554] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The purpose of this qualitative project was to describe and examine expectations and experiences of menopause and midlife in pre- and postmenopausal Chinese American and Chinese women in the United States. Methods: Four focus groups were formed from a total of 44 women: two groups of premenopausal Chinese/Chinese American women (one conducted in English and one in Cantonese) and two groups of postmenopausal Chinese/Chinese American women (one conducted in English acid one in Cantonese). Qualitative data, in the form of transcripts, were interpreted using text-based content analysis. Results: The major thematic findings were: meanings of menopause are inextricably bound with meanings of midlife, the borders and timing of the menopausal transition are ambiguous; the menopausal transition represents a natural progression through the life cycle; the expectations of the premenopausal women did not match the experiences of the postmenopausal women; menopause is viewed as a marker for aging; and the menopausal transition must be prepared for and managed. Conclusions. Study findings indicate that the participants did not share the strictly medicalized view of menopause as a discrete, biological entity. Menopause was typically described as a natural transition that was virtually interchangeable with midlife. While most of the participants characterized menopause as signaling the end of fertility and virtually synonymous with old age, some women described it as a new opportunity and a second chance at life. Participants felt a sense of their own agency in addressing what they viewed as a complex life stage, the experience of which could be manipulated. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据