4.7 Article

Estimation of skeletal muscle interstitial adenosine during forearm dynamic exercise in humans

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 1124-1128

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.35.5.1124

关键词

microdialysis; adenosine; muscle, skeletal; exercise; lactates

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00095] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-56693] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been proposed that adenosine is a metabolic signal that triggers activation of muscle afferents involved in the exercise presser reflex. Furthermore, exo,exogenous adenosine induces sympathetic activation that mimics the exercise presser reflex, and blockade of adenosine receptors inhibits sympathetic activation induced by exercise. Thus, we hypothesize that adenosine is released locally by the muscle during exercise. We used microdialysis probes, placed in the flexor digitorium superficialis muscle, to estimate muscle interstitial adenosine levels in humans. We estimated resting in vivo muscle interstitial adenosine concentrations (0.292+/-0.058 mu mol/L, n=4) by pel-fusing increasing concentrations of adenosine to determine the gradient produced in the dialysate. Muscle interstitial adenosine concentrations increased from 0.23+/-0.04 to 0.82+/-0.14 mu mol/L (n=14, P<0.001) during intermittent dynamic exercise at 50% of maximal voluntary contraction. Lactate increased from 0.8+/-0.1 to 2.3+/-0.3 mmol/L (P<0.001). Lower intensity (15% maximal voluntary contraction) intermittent dynamic exercise increased adenosine concentrations from 0.104+/-0.02 to 0.42+/-0.16 mu mol/L (n=7). The addition of ischemia to this low level of exercise produced a greater increase in adenosine (from 0.095+/-0.02 to 0.48+/-0.2 mu mol/L) compared with nonischemic exercise (0.095+/-0.02 to 0.25+/-0.12 mu mol/L). These results indicate that microdialysis is useful in estimating adenosine concentrations and in reflecting changes in muscle interstitial adenosine during dynamic exercise in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据