4.7 Article

Thermoresponsive Hydrogels from Phosphorylated ABA Triblock Copolymers: A Potential Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 2206-2214

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm4003442

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51073102]
  2. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [122034]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0592]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1163]
  5. Foundations of Sichuan Province [2012JQ0009]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2010SCU22001, 2011SCU04A04]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2010248, BK2011340]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of thermoresponsive and biocompatible ABA triblock copolymers in which the outer A blocks comprise poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and the central B block consists of O-phosphoethanolamine (PEA) grafted poly(acrylic acid) (PAA(PEA)) are achieved by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and subsequent modification. At a relatively low concentration (2 w/v% in phosphate buffered saline), the triblock copolymers can form free-standing gels at 37 degrees C. Using a combination of variable-temperature H-1 NMR, dynamic light scattering, and rheological measurements, it is demonstrated that the gelation behavior is highly dependent on both the length of A blocks and the substitution degree of phosphate group. To examine the potential application as scaffold for bone tissue engineering, the physical application as scaffold for bone tissue engineering, the physical gels are incubated in the simulated body fluid (SBF) for 2 weeks. Obvious nucleation and growth of hydroxyapatite are found in the gels, as indicated by the scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction measurements. The triblock copolymers also exhibit low cytotoxicity in cell viability test. Thus the triblock copolymers have great potential for bone tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据