4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Functional deficiencies of components of the MHC class I antigen pathway in human tumors of epithelial origin

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 S88-S95

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702363

关键词

chaperones; IFN-gamma; MHC class 1; peptide transporter; proteasome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An association between oncogenic transformation and repression of different components of the MHC class I antigen processing machinery (APM) have been described in murine model systems. In order to discover whether a similar correlation exists, human tumor cell lines of distinct histology with altered ras protein were analyzed for the expression of APM components utilizing RT-PCR and Western blot analyses. A heterogeneous expression pattern of MHC class I antigens, TAP peptide transporter, proteasome subunits, proteasome activator PA28 and the chaperones calnexin, calreticulin as well as tapasin was displayed by these tumor cell lines. Single or combined deficiencies in the expression and/or function of TAP, LMP2, LMP10 and tapasin were demonstrated in 11 of 12 cell lines studied, whereas the expression of calnexin, calreticulin, beta 2-microglobulin, LMP7 and PA28 alpha was unaltered or only weakly decreased. The impaired expression of TAP, LMP subunits and tapasin was not associated with altered ras, but resulted in reduced MHC class I surface expression. In particular, a significant allele- and locus-specific downregulation of the HLA-A and HLA-B haplotypes was found. IFN-gamma treatment corrected the TAP, LMP and tapasin deficiencies and enhanced the constitutive PA28 alpha, LMP7, calnexin and calreticulin expression which was accompanied with increased levels of MHC class I antigens, Thus, dysregulation rather than structural alterations of different APM components might be one mechanism of colon carcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma and pancreatic carcinoma cell lines to evade immune recognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据