4.7 Article

Preparation of Ultrathin, Robust Protein Microcapsules through Template-Mediated Interfacial Reaction between Amine and Catechol Groups

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 3861-3869

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm400983a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB724705]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [21125627]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [20976127, 21076145]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0623]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B06006]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [09JCYBJC06700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel approach to the synthesis of protein microcapsules is developed through template-mediated interfacial reaction. Protein-doped CaCO3 templates are first synthetized via coprecipitation and then coated with a catechol-containing alginate (AlgDA) layer. Afterward, the templates are exposed to ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid disodium (EDTA) solution to dissolve CaCO3. During CaCO3 dissolution, the generated CO2 gas pushes protein molecules moving to the AlgDA layer, and thereby Michael addition and Schiff base reactions proceed, forming the shell of protein microcapsules. Three kinds of proteins, namely, bovine serum albumin, catalase, and protamine sulfate, are utilized. The shell thickness of microcapsule varies from 25 to 82 nm as the doping amount of protein increased from 2 to 6 mg per 66 mg CaCO3. The protein microcapsules have a robust but flexible shell and can be reversibly deformed upon exposure to osmotic pressure. The bioactivity of protein microcapsules is demonstrated through enzymatic catalysis experiments. The protein microcapsules remain about 80% enzymatic activity of the equivalent free protein. Hopefully, our approach could be extended to many other applications such as drug/gene delivery, tissue scaffolds, and catalysis due to the universality of Michael reaction and Schiff base reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据