4.7 Article

Partially mismatched related-donor bone marrow transplantation for pediatric patients with acute leukemia: Younger donors and absence of peripheral blasts improve outcome

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 1856-1866

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.9.1856

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To extend access to bone marrow transplantation (BMT), we used partially mismatched related donors [PMRD) for pediatric patients with acute leukemia. In this report we sought to determine pretransplantation factors that might predict outcome. Patients and Methods Of 67 such patients, 43 had acute lymphocytic leukemia and 24 had acute myelogenous leukemia. At the time of transplantation, 41 patients were in relapse. Donors included 40 parents, 24 siblings, and three cousins. HLA disparity of two to three major antigens was detected in two thirds of the donor recipient pairs. Conditioning therapy, including total-body irradiation and chemotherapy followed by graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis with partial T-cell depletion of the grab using T1089 or OKT3, was combined with posttransplantation immunosuppression. Results: Estimated probability (EP) of engraftment was 0.96 and was not affected by donor-antigen mis-match (AgMM; P = .732). EP of grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD was 0.24 and was not affected by recipient AgMM (P = .796). EP of disease-free survival was 0.26 at 3 years but improved ta 0.45 when donors were younger than 30 years (P < .001). EP of relapse at 3 years was 0.41 and reduced with younger donors' age. For patients who were in relapse at the time of transplantation, absence of blasts was associated with a lower relapse rate (0.46 v 0.84; P = .083), similar to that of patients in remission. Conclusion: PMRD-BMT in pediatric leukemia resulted in high engraftment and low GVHD rates. To improve outcomes, younger donors should be sought, and clinicians should attempt to reduce peripheral blasts in patients who are in relapse. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据