4.3 Article

Reproduction and horticultural performance of transgenic ethylene-insensitive petunias

出版社

AMER SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.125.3.277

关键词

Petunia xhybrida; ethylene sensitivity; flower senescence; fruit ripening; seed germination; adventitious root formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of experiments on ethylene-insensitive (EI) petunia plants (Petunia xhybrida Hort. Vilm.-Andr.) generated in two genetic backgrounds were conducted to determine the involvement of ethylene in horticultural performance. Experiments examined various aspects of horticultural performance: days to flower, flower senescence after pollination and without pollination, fruit set and ripening, and adventitious root formation on vegetative stem cuttings. The development of EI plants was altered in several ways, Time from seed sowing to first flower anthesis was decreased by a week for EI plants grown at 26/21 degrees C. Flower senescence ill nonpollinated and self-pollinated flowers was delayed in all EI plants compared to wild-type plants. Fruit set percentage on EI plants was slightly lower than on wildtype plants and fruit ripening on EI plants was delayed by up to 7 days. EI plants produced fewer commercially acceptable rooted cuttings than wild-type plants. There was a basic difference in the horticultural performance of the two EI lines examined due to a difference in the genetic backgrounds used to generate the lines. EI plants displayed better horticultural performance when grown with day/night temperatures of 26/21 degrees C than 30/24 degrees C. These results suggest that tissue-specific ethylene insensitivity as well as careful consideration of the genetic background used in transformation procedures and growth conditions of etr1-1 plants will be required to produce commercially viable transgenic floriculture crops. EI petunias provide an ideal model system for studying the role of ethylene in regulating various aspects of plant reproduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据