4.7 Article

Self-Assembled Chlorin e6 Conjugated Chondroitin Sulfate Nanodrug for Photodynamic Therapy

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 1724-1730

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm200115v

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea
  2. Gyeonggi Regional Research Center (GRRC)
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [K0006001] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acetylated-chondroitin sulfate/chlorin e6 conjugates (Ac-CS/Ce6 1, 2, 3) were synthesized via the formation of an ester linkage between CS and Ce6 and evaluated as nanoscale drugs for photo dynamic therapy. Ac-CS/Ce6 2 and 3 with higher Ce6 contents of 11.7 and 17.6%, respectively, had average diameters of < 150 nm and were very stable in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 month. The critical self-quenching concentration (CQC) of Ac-CS/Ce6 decreased as the conjugated-amount of Ce6 increased. All samples displayed autophotoquenching properties in aqueous solution, whereas their fluorescence intensity strongly correlated with the amount of Ce6 in the organic solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Compared with free Ce6, Ac-CS/Ce6 nanodrug photoactivity was maintained in terms of fluorescence properties and singlet oxygen (O-1(2)) generation. In a He La cell culture system, we observed rapid cellular uptake of the Ac-CS/Ce6 nanodrug without any other ligands using confocal imaging and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Upon light irradiation following cellular uptake, phototoxicity was detected via 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The self-quenching effect and fluorescence recovery of Ac-CS/Ce6 were also determined both in vitro and in vivo, Taken together, our results indicate that Ac-CS/Ce6 has potential as an effective photo dynamic therapy (PDT) prodrug for clinical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据