4.7 Article

The role of gibberellin biosynthesis in the control of growth and flowering in Matthiola incana

期刊

PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 97-105

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100114.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, it was found that stem elongation and flowering of stock Matthiola incana (L.) R. Br. are promoted by exogenous gibberellins (GAs), including GA(4), and also by acylgclohexanedione inhibitors of GA biosynthesis, such as prohexadione-calcium (PCa) and trinexapac-ethyl (TNE). Here, because it was unclear how GA biosynthetic inhibitors could promote stem elongation and flowering, their effect on GA biosynthesis has been examined by quantifying endogenous GA levels; also, the sensitivity of stem elongation and flowering to various GAs in combination with the inhibitors was examined. Stem elongation and flowering were most effectively promoted by GA(4) when combined with PCa and, next in order, by 2,2-dimethyl-GA(4), PCa, GA(4) + TNE, TNE, GA(9) +PCa and by GA(4). There was little or no promotion by GA(1), GA(3), GA(9), GA(13), GA(20) and 3-epi-2,2-dimethyl-GA(4). Both the promotive effects of the acylcyclohexanediones on stem elongation and flowering, particularly when applied with GA(4), and the fact that TNE caused a build-up of endogenous GA(4) imply that one effect of TNE at the lower dose involved an inhibition of 2 beta-hydroxylation of GA(4) rather than an inhibition of 20-oxidation and 3 beta-hydroxylation of GAs which were precursors of GA(4). Overall, these results indicate that: (1) GAs with 3 beta-OH and without 13-OH groups (e.g. GA(4)) are the most important for stem elongation and flowering in M. incana; (2) growth promotion rather than inhibition can result if an acylcyclohexanedione acts predominantly to slow 2 beta-hydroxylation and so slows inactivation of active gibbberellins, including GA(4). It follows that a low dose of an acylcyclohexanedione can be a 'growth enhancer' for any applied GA that is liable to inactivation by 2 beta-hydroxylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据