4.7 Article

Differential effects of UTP and ATP on ion transport in porcine tracheal epithelium

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 130, 期 2, 页码 367-374

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703324

关键词

airway; ATP; cystic fibrosis; epithelium; ion transport; P2Y receptor; pyrimidine receptor; UTP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Isolated segments of porcine tracheal epithelium were mounted in Ussing chambers, current required to maintain transepithelial potential difference at 0 mV (short circuit current, I-SC) was monitored and effects of nucleotides upon I-SC were studied. 2 Mucosal UTP (100 mu M) evoked a transient rise in I-SC that was followed by a sustained fall below basal Is, maintained for 30 min. Mucosal ATP (100 mu M) also stimulated a transient rise in I-SC but in contrast to UTP did not inhibit basal I-SC. Submucosal UTP and ATP both transiently increased I-SC 3 UTP-prestimulated epithelia were refractory to ATP but prestimulation with ATP did not abolish the response to UTP. The epithelia thus appear to express two populations of apical receptors allowing nucleotides to modulate I-SC. 4 The UTP-induced rise was reduced by pretreatment with either bumetanide (100 mu M), diphenylamin-2-carboxylic acid (DPC, 1 mM), or Cl- and HCO3--free solution whilst the fall was abolished by amiloride pretreatment. 5 Thapsigargin (0.3 mu M) abolished the UTP-induced increase in I-SC but not the subsequent decrease. Staurosporine (0.1 mu M) inhibited basal I-SC and blocked UTP-induced inhibition of I-SC Inhibitors of either protein kinase C (PKC) CD-erythro sphingosine) or PKA (H89) had no effect. 6 This study suggests that UTP stimulates Cl- secretion and inhibits basal Na+ absorption. ATP has a similar stimulatory effect, which may be mediated by activation of P2Y(2) receptors and an increase in [Ca2+](in), but no inhibitory effect, which is likely mediated by activation of a pyrimidine receptor and possible inhibition of a protein kinase other than PKC or PKA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据