4.7 Article

Degradation of Chitosans with a Family 46 Chitosanase from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 2487-2497

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm1006745

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [164653/V40, 177542/V30]
  2. Biopolymer Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have studied the degradation of well-characterized soluble heteropolymeric chitosans by a novel family 46 chitosanase, ScCsn46A from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), to obtain insight into the enzyme's mode of action and to determine its potential for production of different chitooligosaccharides. The degradation of both a fully deacetylated chitosan and a 32% acetylated chitosan showed a continuum of oligomeric products and a rapid disappearance of the polymeric fraction, which is diagnostic for a nonprocessive endomode of action. The kinetics of the degradation of the 32% acetylated chitosan demonstrated an initial rapid phase and a slower second phase, in addition to a third and even slower kinetic phase. The first phase reflects the cleavage of the glycosidic linkage between two deacetylated units (D-D), the primary products being fully deacetylated dithers, trimers, and tetramers, as well as longer oligomers with increasing degrees of acetylation. In the subsequent slower kinetic phases, oligomers with a higher degree of acetylated units (A) appear, including oligomers with A's at the reducing or nonreducing end, which indicate that there are no absolute preferences for D in subsites -1 and +1. After maximum degradation of the chitosan, the dimers DA and DD were the dominant products. The degradation of chitosans with varying degrees of acetylation to a maximum degree of scission showed that ScCsn46A could degrade all chitosan substrates extensively, although to decreasing degrees of scission with increasing F-A. The potential use of ScCsn46A to prepare fully deacetylated oligomers and more highly acetylated oligomers from chitosan substrates with varying degrees of acetylation is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据